![](https://pawb.social/pictrs/image/304395c4-489a-4eab-9069-0e82790113ab.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I’m still waiting for the furries to switch to Matrix.
I’m still waiting for the furries to switch to Matrix.
People who use “dude” as a gender neutral term should tell me how many dudes they’ve kissed.
One doesn’t have to go looking, there’s lots of assholes who think it’s “apolitical” to assume that everyone working in software is a dude.
Now?
I recall a project that had rat brain cells controlling a turtlebot years ago.
Poe’s Law and its corrolaries are the bane of my existence. XD
It’s hard to laugh at absurdity when a not-insignificant percentage of the population genuinely believes it to be truth.
Where’s the /s?
I’m not kidding, I can’t tell if you’re being sincere or sarcastic. XD
Colorado is great, just don’t move anywhere near Colorado Springs unless you wanna help turn it purple. The city is a Republican enclave full of defense contractors and wrapped around the Air Force Academy and a Space Force base.
IIRC, you can run the Xiaomi unlocking software in wine: https://www.hardreset.info/devices/redmi/redmi-9c/faq/faq/xiaomi-bootloader-unlock-miui10/
It really isn’t a different debate when you’re talking about putting them on the blockchain, and all that other engineering has already been done by other distributed social networks.
Trust, consensus, and access control are session-layer issues that don’t need to be solved by a transport-layer protocol. Social networks deserve to be able to forget things.
We already have that, it’s called a Distributed Hash Table, no blockchain required.
knockoffs like Brave
No worries, I’m merely confident that the tradeoffs necessary to employ a blockchain aren’t worth the supposed benefits thereof.
What if we don’t want global usernames? What if we’re entirely satisfied with global user IDs in a DHT?
Seems inefficient, couldn’t the same thing be accomplished using local DBs rather than the world’s most inefficient ledger?
This but unironically.
That’s how I got sucked into scifi serials a few years back. It’s like soap operas with spaceships and I can’t believe I’m into this now. XD
Yes.
They expected companies not to make badly-designed not-phones that depend entirely on internet services, most of which will undoubtedly be shuttered by the end of the year.
We already don’t, our choices are dictated to us by the executive boards that act as America’s unelected central planning committees.
So they can implement their own backdoor