![](https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/cf578083-5772-4b2f-a181-51285d32757b.jpeg)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/c0e83ceb-b7e5-41b4-9b76-bfd152dd8d00.png)
Suddenly, I miss the old days of Android. I suppose it’s back to CyanogenMod or whatever it is these days
Just another person seeking connection, community, and diversity of thought in an increasingly polarized and team-based society.
Other contacts:
Suddenly, I miss the old days of Android. I suppose it’s back to CyanogenMod or whatever it is these days
Sure there is… stop using Facebook.
Regulatory capture seems about on par for Google these days. I suppose I’ll be switching back to OnePlus for Android devices; that’ll be about it for Google stuff in my home.
“Most” seems to be doing some incredibly generous work here.
My experience with lemmy.world has this as par for the course. They’ve… got some interesting moderators.
Yarr intensifies
Like about how that… doesn’t actually change anything that was said?
Right, so anyone adopting such a “buy for a month and binge watch” strategy can still pay ~75% more and not receive a ~75% increase in value.
Nothing is changed.
Well, when the price increases by ~75% and the value does not increase by ~75%, this sentiment isn’t exactly surprising.
Yarr intensifies
Frankly, I make solid six figures and still have a hard time even contemplating buying a new car. With how much value is lost short-term it’s like just burning cash.
I think the best vehicular investment I’ve ever made was a moderately-used Chevy Volt for, like, ~14k. That thing is a tank and still gets some EV / efficiency cred.
In the same sense that your response was in any way tied to anything stated, sure.
Considering your “source” is “trust me bro Garand Thumb showed it bro”, I’ll give your trolling concerns due consideration.
I have to suggest you take your own advice and, once more, highlight the absurdity of your position in baseless “lol no ur wrong”.
You’re right that Garand Thumb has great videos. You’re wrong that FMJ universally goes through human-form ballistic dummies. It can, sure. Is guaranteed to? Far from it. You seem to be pointedly ignoring the assumptions necessary for you to make such a ridiculous generalization.
Edit: had you mixed up with a troll; removed the irrelevant parts.
Im pointing out how absurd of a claim it is that small rounds run no risk of over penetration.
Oh, so you’re addressing something other than was actually stated?
You might want to revisit what I had actually said. Run no risk? Hardly.
It’s funny how much of a thrashing you’re getting for spreading this misinformation. Hopefully you consider it before the next, or first, time you pick up a gun.
I’m not sure I’d consider a handful of randos making absurd, baseless claims to be a thrashing - one could call it dogpiling, sure. Thrashing implies some sort of beatdown, though… and all you’ve brought is nonsense. If you’d been able to back up that misinformation nonsense in any way - say, by addressing and refuting points made - you may have had a point.
Yikes, dude.
At this point you’re just repeating yourself with additional hyperbole and insult; it looks like we’re done here.
I wasn’t aware drywall is exactly identical to the human body. Could you highlight that reasoning?
You are saying absurd things.
And you are clearly projecting your ignorance of firearms and ballistics.
I’m well aware of the ballistics; that over-penetration depends on incredible assumptions. Try the ballistic dummy tests for a better representation as the factor in the bone. The human body is more than gelatin.
And no, this is not true for hollow points.
If guns are permitted so that they can fight a tyrannical government
There is no “only” in play here; “fight a tyrannical government” is just an extension of self defense.
why are people allowed to carry them to shoot other citizens?
Self-defense.
That would be several steps up from where BSG is.