It can be either or neither. Context dependent. Although I’m having a hard time coming up with a scenario where being “cool” is affected by drug consumption in any way.

If you provide people with the means to replace lost crypto keys, then you’ve lost the security gained from using them.

This is a problem with the add-on store, not the browser. Do the forks have their own add-on stores? Or do they just use the same one that Mozilla provides? To the best of my knowledge, the only forks that have their own stores are the ones that wouldn’t be able to use Firefox plugins anyway (e.g. Palemoon).

I don’t think forking Firefox is going to change what you see in the add-on store. You would need someone to run their own store. Or just install the plugin manually.

I’d be surprised if being born with a specific face configuration isn’t protected in the same way that race and gender are.

Treat people well, and people will like you.

Somehow, we manage to accept organ transplants despite it hurting one healthy person a little to help an unhealthy person a lot. What’s stopping us from treating birth control the same way?

It takes a lot longer to wash if you go that route. If you don’t have enough time for that, then you can’t do it without foregoing your other responsibilities. That qualifies as “can’t”. It’s a lie as much as telling elementary school kids that the sky is blue is a lie. We simplify things because kids don’t have the ability to follow all the complex interactions between everything going on in their lives.

Moving them onto another surface also means an additional surface to clean. Floors don’t need anything more than regular vacuuming or a quick mop most of the time. If you get grease there, that’s so much more work to clean up.

You’ll have to explain what you mean by universal healthcare then. Wikipedia says

Universal healthcare does not imply coverage for all cases and for all people

Universal Healthcare doesnt have that problem, it’s what universal means.

This idealized version of universal healthcare isn’t possible because it’ll require more resources than we have as a species. There’s always more that you can do to improve health outcomes. A line had to be drawn somewhere.

… are you not supposed to look at one eye at a time?

Surely if you sexually assaulted someone, you’d go around telling people about your great accomplishments.

I’ve suspected it long before we met, but never really thought about it much beyond “yeah, I’m probably autistic. Anyway …” and never talked about it either.

My partner was the one to first bring it up ten years into our relationship, thinking it was very obvious and said it explains a ton of peculiar behaviours I have that I never even considered to be related to autism.

It is made by scientists. And we don’t know how to make the model determine whether or not it knows something. So far, we only have tools that tell us that something probably wasn’t in the training set (e.g. using variance across models in a mixture of experts setup), but that doesn’t tell us anything about how correct it is.

I’ve heard Elon Musk (or was it Karpathy?) talking about how camera should be sufficient for all scenarios because humans can do it on vision alone, but that’s poor reasoning IMO. Cars are not humans, so there’s no reason to confine them to the same limitations. If we want them to be safer and more capable than human drivers, one way to do that is by providing them with more information.

Oh, I see. You’re clarifying why jonne thought this was the case, not arguing for why they’re correct.

As someone who regularly interacts with people with ADHD, my go-to response to “huh?” is just to wait a few seconds in silence. It has yet to fail me.

The article is about Google. Why does it matter that it’s missing from the Alphabet handbook?

and a handful of other people that don’t understand why their ideas are being acted on

The image this evokes is hilarious