Mastodon

Have you ever considered that the Prime Directive is not only not ethical, but also illogical, and perhaps morally indefensible?

  • 2 Posts
  • 58 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle



  • I’m not sure to what degree the PD would apply in a situation like this:

    • As is tradition, I must point out that whether a species is warp-capable influences whether Starfleet can make first contact, but even if they can, the PD itself applies to all civilizations, and Starfleet is compelled to minimize their interference.

    • Cultural contamination/interference is minimal, since it’s one individual entering the Federation’s sphere of influence. Ethically, they should probably help the person return home, assuming they want to.

    The closest analogue I can think of is Gillian Taylor in Star Trek IV, and the Federation put her to work in pretty short order.












  • Scotty managed to keep a whole ship crew alive for decades in the buffer of a transporter, and did not need the entire ship’s storage.

    It was just him and Ensign Franklin, and Franklin didn’t survive the attempt.

    didn’t the DS9 incident happen entirely on accident?

    No, it was a deliberate decision by Eddington.

    ODO: Do we still have their patterns?

    EDDINGTON: Yes. They’re in the buffer. But the patterns will start to degrade if not used immediately. We need to store the patterns somewhere.

    ODO: This is more complicated than just an ordinary transporter pattern. We’re going to have to preserve all the neural signatures of everyone on that runabout. Do you know how much memory it would take to save just one person’s neural signature, much less five?

    EDDINGTON: I don’t think we have any choice. Computer, I need to store all data currently in the transporter pattern buffer. Where can I save it?

    COMPUTER: There is insufficient computer memory to save the data.

    ODO: The pattern buffer’s beginning to lose coherence. The patterns will start to degrade any second now.

    EDDINGTON: Computer, what if we wiped all computer memory in every system on the station and then stored the patterns?

    COMPUTER: That procedure has not been tested. It cannot be predicted.

    ODO: The buffer is depolarising.

    EDDINGTON: Computer, this is a command priority override. Wipe all computer memory necessary in order to save the patterns from the buffer. Authorisation Eddington 0-6-5-alpha enable.



  • The TNG Technical Manual explanation is pretty straightforward - storing “neural energy” (and indeed replicating any living creature) requires capturing the quantum state of every particle in the organism, with a zero percent error rate, and they simply don’t have the storage capacity to do so reliably. The one time they managed to store neural patterns long-term, it required the entire storage capacity of Deep Space 9 to store the neural patterns of five people (“Our Man Bashir”).

    The transporter buffers can handle these patterns on a short-term basis, but the tradeoff is that they start to degrade over time (typically portrayed as within a few minutes, though there’s some variability).