I feel the logical conclusion is to just destroy all human created content entirely to avoid being exploited by corporations. But that may not be a reasonable solution.
It would be like an artist refusing to record or perform their music for fear of someone else making money from it or copying the style.
Oh well that’s reasonable then /s
Who gets to be the parents in this situation?
Completely agree and I was referring only to this specific instance.
I agree with all points, but isn’t the officer who stopped it from continuing the ‘good guy with a gun’ here?
It’s almost like it’s possible to have good guys with guns without letting every single person get guns by default.
Only below 3ish grams or above 1000 grams though.
Until the idiots all complained about it being ‘creepy’. Ever since the tracking completely continued, but no longer with any benefit to us.
Great job idiots. Why people just don’t opt not to use features they find ‘creepy’ I’ll never understand. They are only satisfied if they bring it down for everyone.
Dealerships are literally the worst place to take a vehicle for a repair. They are in the car selling business, not the car fixing business.
Haha same despite not being active at all for months now. In any case, the email explains only residents of the USA are eligible.
Sequels too. A perfect movie can’t benefit from them, but shitty movies might be able to.
Hard to call them stupid when they got to use it for free within the return window. Seems like a good deal. I agree with all the other points though.
Doesn’t work so well on the colourblind though.
Just ordered one. I had no real interest, but once you tell me I can’t have one…I must have one.
Where in the world did you get that number and what were the specific parameters?
Can we ban ‘skate stoppers’ intended to physically injure skaters who attempt the feature too?
Like, if it’s designed from the start to not be super skateable that’s fine. But adding things after the spot is already established that will cause people to ‘catch’ and fall seems a bit messed up.
Those intact icicles seem out of place
If Google specifically denied tracking that’s definitely misleading, but I’m unable to find a source for it and don’t recall it myself.
Saying that the sites you visit track you would absolutely lead me to believe that search engines sites are included. Since it would not be possible to provide results for the search without knowing what was searched for by the user. And where would they send those results to without knowing the users IP or other form of network address? It just doesn’t make any sense to think a search engine would not know who searched for what, since it is required for them to function.
I always saw Google as a website too. So if I type ‘giant donkey dicks’ into the url/search bar, then Google is obviously going to know my preference for large donkey dicks. Since I googled it.
Or are these hypothetical common folk typing in full urls themselves or something? If it’s auto-filling in any way, that’s thanks to Google and they can only provide it if aware what has been typed so far.
They didn’t do a proper legalization like Canada though. Just half-assed it.