No security or feature updates, but selling as “new.” I guess they need to switch to Linux if able…

  • HousePanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    There should be a legal requirement to make documentation available for all unsupported Chromebooks to unlock the boot loader and allow for installing an alternative OS. Furthermore, they should be required to release engineering docs.

    • nous@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They should also be required to support it for X (exact time is up for debate) years after they stop selling it so you have some minimum amount of time that you know the device will be supported for no matter when you buy it.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        And not just software vendors, but chip and board manufacturers with at least security fixes for at least the same length of time, but maybe like X+2 years to account for devices being released after the initial components

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      And Android and whatever else.

      You want to lock down bootloaders and installed software while you’re supporting it? It depends on how you manage it how much I like or dislike it. But any software on a device you don’t support should automatically enter public domain and you should be required to unlock it.

    • al177@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Agreed, though I thought that all ChromeOS devices could be bootloader unlocked.