A warning and a perspective from an insider who has been through this before.

  • Ropianos@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, isn’t that sort of mentioned in the article?

    If fediverse development slows down e.g. because adoption of inofficial Facebook extensions takes time it will harm the whole platform. Not by directly taking away users but by blocking progress.

    I don’t think the Fediverse is small enough for this to be a serious concern. Especially once multiple companies (Tumblr?) are invested in the fediverse I don’t see this happening anymore.

    • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes I read that and explained why I don’t think its relevant. Facebook can’t slow down progress on the fediverse because:

      1. progress is already slow. The fediverse has been in development for 15 years and still is a clunky, niche network and likely will always be less polished than large corporate networks.
      2. Every developer on the fediverse is aware of the EEE playbook and next to none of them will try to remain compatible with any corporate extensions.
      • Ropianos@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. What do you mean? Progress is already slow so any additional slow down will seriously harm the fediverse precisely because of the limited resources IMHO.
        2. I’m not quite as optimistic as you but yeah, I don’t think it will be easy for Facebook and if they misjudge it they will end up making a competitor stronger by bringing more attention to it.
        • 0x1C3B00DA@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          But #1 is predicated on #2. If developers are aware of the risk of EEE, then they won’t try to remain compatible with Meta extensions, which means development of the open AP ecosystem will continue at the same pace.