• Mozilla has issued a warning about Microsoft’s design practices, claiming that the company uses harmful design tactics to influence users to switch to its Edge browser.
  • The report highlights how Microsoft interrupts the installation process of Google Chrome on Windows devices, promoting the security and privacy benefits of Edge.
  • Mozilla calls for regulatory action to restore browser choice and competition across major platforms.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/koBY6


Chrome

Windows

Well there’s your problem!

    • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I like that part of firefox’s summary was that it’s free. Uh, yeah, they all are. Thanks Mozilla!

    • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t remember that. Where is it from?

      Microsoft never liked competing browsers (not even in the pre-IE6 era when all they had was crap), so it’s hard to believe it came from them.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        EU fined the sh1t out of them, and somebody in the regulatory body at the time realized that was not enough. So they were ordered to present the user with a choice of a browser during the OS install.

        What I really want to know is why and how it went away.

          • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            No, but apparently people are going to be a cunt about it if one chooses not to say it.

          • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’d say I got a good habit. Too much of the internet randomly filters “obscenity”. Whenever that happens it seems the devs are too fvkin damb to properly implement it.

            • Melt@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah god damn the censor shit, even on fucking picture, they censor the swear words to fucking hell by scribing over it

        • neclimdul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          INAL but my understanding was a lot of the fines and penalties hung on IE being part of the OS. I think it was the update functionality but don’t quote me.

          So with some legal technicalities, later versions of windows made it “not” part of the OS just a bundled application. A legal distinction without meaning but it meant they didn’t need to do these things anymore.

          • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            The great joke is they are making the same mistakes again with edge, unfortunately the American justice system is a shambles these days so it’s probably down to the EU to take the moral high ground.

            Microsoft appear to be exposed to monopolistic penalties in several markets currently: browsers, AI / search, teams and office come to mind (although competitors are lacking, here)

        • Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          What I really want to know is why and how it went away.

          The move was in place because of the fear that IE was becoming a monopoly. Now Edge is very very far from the most popular browser, and Google Chrome is looking like the overwhelmingly dominant player, there’s no reason to make MS prompt people to download rival products anymore.

        • Madis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think it will be back this March with the new laws (Digital Markets Act).

  • Geo_bot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    5 months ago

    Microsoft really trying to get away with what it did in the browser wars again, but it’s probably gonna turn out on for them this time

  • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    The clickbait in this article is so bad, I thought it was a security vulnerability or something, but it’s just something else related to Mozilla again.

    I’m still genuinely curious if Mozilla is going to actually accept a renewal for the search deal with Google, or if they’re actually going to start practicing with a praise and try implementing that search engine selection screen.

    • Alcatorda@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 months ago

      practicing with a praise

      Not sure what you mean but maybe you were going for “practicing what they preach”?

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      or if they’re actually going to start practicing with a praise and try implementing that search engine selection screen.

      You already can change the default search engine?

  • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Whenever I’m forced to use Edge for work it reminds me of old IE that your grandma installed the Ask toolbar in. Functions about the same too.

  • Piwix@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Legit malware shown in this article. Imagine an operating system/browser injecting what are essentially ads into your webpage. Whether or not chrome or edge are any good these are scummy tactics by microsoft

  • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    What is this clickbait bullshit? Here I was expecting more arguments I could use to move people away from Chrome, but the warning is just typical Microsoft trying to promote their own garbage browser.

  • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is a super clickbait title.

    Yes, what Microsoft does is pretty shitty but the article sounds like there’s some massive zero day hack or something to watch out for when it’s just standard business practice.

    • AnActOfCreation@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agreed. I would’ve changed it except I had in the back of my mind that the post title needed to match the article title, but now I don’t see that in the rules. Oh well. But yeah the article is not really about Chrome at all.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        You know what else is different about Lemmy? Post titles are editable!

  • Jay@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    I updated my proton app recently and as I was updating it Microsoft edge updater tried installing updates as well for some reason.

    I don’t even have edge installed. I simply blocked it from having net access but still, they can go take a flying fuck at a rolling donut if they think I’m putting that on my system.

    • 800XL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      One time I uninstalled Edge and Cortana from Win10. Some time later Windows Updates started to fail and would rollback. This continued for 6 months and by that time I stopped giving a shit since Win10 is malware anyway.

      Another few months went by and I was bored enough to follow the usually useless links to MS knowledge base articles that are given after a failed update.

      After another week of trying everything I came across or could think of, I downloaded the install for Edge and reinstalled. Ran the Windows Update again and the god damned thing was successful. Apparently it contained an Edge-specific update but didn’t check if it was installed or not and fail gracefully if it was the latter.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      they can go take a flying fuck at a rolling donut if they think I’m putting that on my system.

      The only way to be serious about that is to not use Windows.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’d like to flip to Linux, but I have an older nvidia card that doesn’t play well with it, so until I upgrade some hardware win 10 will have to do. At least I’m firewalled so I can block their shit when it tries shenanigans like that.

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          How old are we talking? Most distros have legacy driver packages that go back a fair bit.

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah MS has never done anything like that before…

    Looks at MS Word in early nineties…

  • snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    The worst thing Microsoft has done with Edge, was how they tried telling everyone it wasn’t Internet Explorer, while using very similar icons for the longest time. Edge functioned a lot like Internet Explorer in how unstable and shitty it was.

    Still is.

    • Cosmonaut_Collin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Edge is just a modified Chrome, so it’s not all that bad now, but Microsoft needs to stop micromanaging what people do with computers. The consumer bought it. It should be their PC, not Microsoft’s.

      • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Seriously, Microsoft needs to get out of their own way with the marketing and just make a good product instead of trying to force all these things on people. They’d get a lot less negative attention if they just focused on the browser. The times I’ve tried it, it wasn’t bad but I now refuse to use it out of spite for their forcing it on you.

        This is also a problem with them overall. They’ve improved so many things in modern Windows under the hood (e.g. we’ve gone from installing drivers for every component to needing practically nothing installed manually due to it doing it for you, it rarely bluescreens anymore in my experience, winget is nice) but then they ruin it with stuff like going backwards on the default apps screen (in 10 it was easy to set for common apps like browser/email/media/etc, in 11 its per protocol/file). Making it difficult to switch browsers or using Edge anyways for some things and ignoring the default just pisses people off for no good reason.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Microsoft are still better than Apple in this regard. But they’re both far from acceptable.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    So Microsoft just does the same shit they’ve done a hundred times before and have been penalized for a hundred times before.

    Give them a few billion dollars fine.

    Jail those managers that made this decision

    THAT will make sure they will start behaving. If not, it’s all just “please don’t” and Microsoft being “suuuuurely we would never ever!”

    Fuck Microsoft

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      have been penalized for a hundred times before

      That’s where you’re wrong. The last time they shoveled their browser at us in clearly anti-competitive ways they were found guilty and then … nothing. Essential software or some such, and nothing.

      So no, they haven’t been penalized; not on their Sherman offence, and here they go repeating it.

      Hammer them.

    • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That would be a sure fire way to get Microsoft to pull completely out of Europe leaving thousands of companies without support and a heafty unpaid fine setting on the table.

      It would actually be beneficial for Microsoft to abandon the server farms and offices leaving workers with an email stating the situation and their new job status.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I would love the mayhem that would ensue from Microsoft leaving Europe completely. Dumb fuckers in all those incompetent IT departments that have wasted countless hours of mine because they don’t understand jack shit of what they’re doing would be having strokes, and us geeks would be having a field day keeping essential stuff alive, like medical technology and power plants.

      • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        How could they pull out of Europe if they straight up didn’t exist? I’m suggesting the European Union should fine them enough to go bankrupt.

        • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They wouldn’t pay the fine that would bankrupt them they’d just cut there losses and abandon anything that was seised. They’re an American company and the Asian market is what there after nowadays anyway.

          If you could cut a dead limb off to save the body, wouldn’t you? At the end of the day it depends on how the US and Europe handles civil cases across borders and Microsoft has a lot of ties with the US government.

            • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s not all bad just the federal for the most part. We’re working on that but are politicians are as old as the hills. I believe they spend more time listening to corporate lobby pitches than reading the damn news but that’s our problem to deal with.

              Most of the biggest tech giants have picked up jobs from homeland or the NSA at one point in time or another, Microsoft is just the most prevalent along with Facebook (meta).

              • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m stuck with one of the most fucked state governments, too. Actually, it’s so bad I’ve been aiming to leave for a while, and I’ll likely be gone within the next six weeks ish.

      • meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        You think Microsoft has no assets in Europe? Asset seizure is a sure fire way to get paid when companies refuse to cooperate.

        • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          If it’s a choice between abandoning assets or going bankrupt I think they’d choose abandoning assets. The only exception to that rule is if they have the majority of their company there and that’s just not the case being an American company.