According to The Wall Street Journal, the company has had discussions about how to make money from its games for months now, including in-app purchases, putting a price tag on more premium titles and placing ads on games that subscribers to its ad tier have access to. These methods are common (and effective) in the mobile gaming world, with consumers expected to spend $111.4 billion on mobile games in 2024

The only reason Netflix games library is decent, its are not laid with ads or in-app purchases. If that was changed it would no longer make the experience enjoyable. Hopefully, they don’t.

  • casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is truly absurd.

    Netflix basically bought the rights to republish versions of established mobile games as “Netflix Edition” titles with ads and in-app purchases removed as a value add to subscribers to get them into their games ecosystem. And now they want… to put ads and micro transactions back? I understand the reasoning behind it obviously-- they need a return on their investment-- but that is a clean about-face from their initial strategy

  • net00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    The fuck is the point then? you get to pay to have the privilege of paying more for a mobile game?

    All the netflix games I see are just shitty mobile games, nothing of value will be lost.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      There are some pretty cool games that were ported to mobile by Netflix, like Shovel Knight Pocket Dungeon, but if they are going to inject ads and in-app purchases into them (you know, on top of the subscription), they are going to ruin them

  • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    So they are going to put ads and in-app purchases inside of a paid streaming app that also has ads? Games as part of Netflix only made sense if they were part of a value-add. Having the games individually having monetization completely invalidates paying for Netflix (aside from video).

    This is a dumb idea, and Netflix knows it. Sounds like an intentional plan to kill off their game segment.

  • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Meh, just canceled Netflix anyway. Their lineup is shit.

    Going back to the seven seas.

  • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I didn’t play Netflix games when I had Netflix. Now they want to make that even worse? Good fuckin luck

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Capitalism, yet ruining another platform by trying to squeeze more money out of existing subscribers. It’s never enough.

  • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If the ads fit in-world, like a Coke bilboard in a racing game or as is used in many games now the real product names of guns: I’m fine with that.

    If it’s a fuckin’ popup or splash page or something that isn’t actually part of the game itself, all subtle like: Fuck that.

    Given the mainstream popularity of video games, it makes a lot of sense to get sponsorships to place real world products in the game, the way it’s done on TV and movies. Subtle. Not all up in your face like Wayne’s World (at least that was a joke) or Death Stranding.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    They don’t consider shit, they have a long tern plan that includes publicly flying out test balloons like this to see how pissed off the public get. If it’s benign enough, they’ll do it. If not, they’ll wait a while and try again.